C
オーナーからの返信
3 ヵ月前
Formal Declaration : ================ Any anonymous review lacking a valid receipt or photographic proof is classified as anti-competitive commercial defamation. All defamatory content has been legally archived. We will tolerate no further harassment and reserve all rights to pursue immediate legal action. ____________________________ Regarding this fabricated narrative and the persistent pattern of malicious reviews, we issue this formal statement : 1. Flawed Logic & Self-Incrimination. >> The author admits to patronizing the neighboring shop, yet wrongfully attributed that establishment's 1-star food and 1-star service to us. This is a transparent, fraudulent attempt to impersonate a consumer and spread defamatory falsehoods. 2. CCTV Proof of Fabrication >> CCTV footage confirms the alleged incidents never occurred. This baseless accusation is a malicious attempt to deflect from the competitor's own substandard coffee and service. 3. Fraudulent Pattern & Identical Source. >> This blank, unverified account lacks any profile picture, photos, or proof of purchase. It perfectly matches the exact pattern of 3 previous malicious reviews (Rachel, CHKelvin, OiLan) — originating from the same source. 中文譯本: Coffee Hour 嚴正聲明 : ================== 凡未能提供有效消費單據或照片證明之匿名評價,一律被視為不正當競爭之商業誹謗。所有誹謗內容均已依法存證。本店絕不姑息任何騷擾行為,保留一切法律追究權利。 ____________________________ 針對此篇憑空捏造的虛假評論,本店嚴正回應如下: 1. 邏輯錯亂,冒充顧客. >> 發文者明言光顧鄰店,卻將鄰店的 1 星食物質素與 1 星服務水平之評價留言在本店。這顯然是冒充顧客,惡人先告狀、散佈誹謗性虛假言論的欺詐行為。 2. CCTV 證實全屬捏造. >> 閉路電視(CCTV)畫面證實,所述事件根本從未發生。此等無中生有的指控,完全是以「賊喊捉賊」的惡意手段,企圖掩飾同業自身拙劣的咖啡品質與服務質素。 3. 慣性抹黑,源頭相同. >> 此新開立的空白賬號既無頭像、無相片,亦無消費單據佐證。其手法與過去 3 次惡意負評 (Rachel, CHKelvin, OiLan) 的模式完全一致,顯然出自同一源頭。